Comments on: RAP vs. RAW http://brownfields-development.com/rap-vs-raw/ The smart growth and revitalization movements have converged to bring Brownfields Redevelopment to the forefront. The time is now to restore the environment, create jobs and re-create "Places for People." Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:13:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: Andy Knoch http://brownfields-development.com/rap-vs-raw/#comment-10 Andy Knoch Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:28:41 +0000 http://brownfields-development.com/rap-vs-raw/#comment-10 Robert, Thanks for clearing that up. Next time I’ll ask you before I guess. By the way, I was talking with Ken Laconde from SCS Engineers and he mentioned having seen your comments and also having worked with you in the past. Small world… Robert,

Thanks for clearing that up. Next time I’ll ask you before I guess. By the way, I was talking with Ken Laconde from SCS Engineers and he mentioned having seen your comments and also having worked with you in the past. Small world…

]]> By: Richard Opper http://brownfields-development.com/rap-vs-raw/#comment-6 Richard Opper Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:54:44 +0000 http://brownfields-development.com/rap-vs-raw/#comment-6 Good guess - but wrong. A Removal Action Workplan (RAW) is designed for quick remedies that are, by their nature - simply a “removal” of bad stuff, and therefore require less administrative procedure. However, if the clean-up if more elaborate, or costs more than $1 million in CA, a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) is required (assuming one is working in a CERCLA framework). Good guess - but wrong. A Removal Action Workplan (RAW) is designed for quick remedies that are, by their nature - simply a “removal” of bad stuff, and therefore require less administrative procedure. However, if the clean-up if more elaborate, or costs more than $1 million in CA, a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) is required (assuming one is working in a CERCLA framework).

]]>